The end of the «single shot» judicial doctrine by the tax administration and the need to claify the «double shot» doctrine

Authors

  • Juan Calvo Vérgez

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48297/rtt.v2i137.2293

Keywords:

doctrine of «single shot», Supreme Court, Tax Administration, administrative appeal, tax assessment, substantive defects, doctrine of «double shot», prescription

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze the end of the so-called doctrine of «single shot», according to which it is not possible to dictate new administrative tax acts, substitutes for those annulled, not only when the cause of the annulment resides in a material or substantive defect, but also whn the defect is of an adjective or formal. It also reflects on the scope of the «double shot» doctrine, by virtue of which the Tax Administration can issue a new assessment when a previous one has been annulled as long as the prescription of the former has not occurred and as long as all those issues regarding which a firm resolution has fallen are respected, as well as the taxpayer`s own defense guarantees.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Juan Calvo Vérgez

    Catedrático de Derecho Financiero y Tributario
    Universidad de Extremadura (España)

    Cómo referenciar:
    Versión impresa:
    Cómo referenciar: Calvo Vérgez, J. (2022). El final de la doctrina judicialr del "tiro único" por parte de la Administración tributaria y la necesidad de clarificar la doctrina del "doble tiro". Revista Técnica Tributaria (137), 45-79

    Versión electrónica:
    Cómo referenciar: Calvo Vérgez, J. (2022). El final de la doctrina judicialr del "tiro único" por parte de la Administración tributaria y la necesidad de clarificar la doctrina del "doble tiro". Revista Técnica Tributaria (137), 45-79
    https://doi.org/10.48297/rtt.v2i137.2293

Published

30/06/2022

How to Cite

Calvo Vérgez, J. . (2022). The end of the «single shot» judicial doctrine by the tax administration and the need to claify the «double shot» doctrine. Technical Tax Journal, 2(137), 45-79. https://doi.org/10.48297/rtt.v2i137.2293