The Reference Value in the Face of Contradictory Expert Evidence: Administrative Reasoning and the Limits of the Model

Authors

  • Marcos M. Pascual González

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48297/0d58bx23

Keywords:

Reference value, counter-evidence, duty to state reasons, taxable base, ability-to-pay principle

Abstract

This article examines the reference value in Spanish property taxation from the perspective of its application when the taxpayer submits contradictory expert evidence. Drawing on recent Constitutional Court case law, it argues that the model’s validity does not depend solely on its abstract design, but on the effective possibility of evidentiary contradiction in the specific case.
The paper analyses the current statutory and case-law framework, identifies the existing asymmetry in the duty to state reasons when a well-founded expert report is submitted, and maintains that administrative reasoning constitutes the main operative limit of the model. It concludes by proposing a normative clarification aimed at ensuring an individualized and reviewable administrative response.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Marcos M. Pascual González

    Profesor Titular de Derecho Financiero y Tributario
    Universidad de Oviedo
    (España)

Published

30/06/2026

How to Cite

Pascual González, M. M. (2026). The Reference Value in the Face of Contradictory Expert Evidence: Administrative Reasoning and the Limits of the Model. Technical Tax Journal, 2(153), 205-250. https://doi.org/10.48297/0d58bx23